Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. ![]() ![]() Information on Core i7-9700K and Core i5-13600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. ![]() Core i7-9700K and Core i5-13600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. Look at CPU benchmarks the deficit the ryzen CPUs have there is still there in gaming it just shows in the utilization where the ryzen cpu will have 30-40% more utilization (2700x vs 9900k). Looking at a lot of gaming benchmarks even the i3/pentiums/2400g etc are only 10-20% below the 9900k because gaming benchmarks are made to push the GPUs and not the CPUs so the GPUs bottleneck way before the CPUs,and even if they don't, scaling in games means that slower CPUs can just use more threads to get to the same FPS. This only works if you don't know CPU and GPU utilization. Sandy bridge didn't just clock to 5ghz, but was sporting almost 40% better IPS then Piledriver FX cpus. Which means this is as far away from sandy bridge vs fx then we could get. If anything, assuming there isn't some sort of scaling issue in the testing suite, this seems to indicate that intel's cpus have moderately less IPS then AMD Ryzen+ and are currently getting by with clock speed alone. These Intel cpus DO NOT have higher IPS then Ryzen. yet the chip is running at 5.0ghz vs the 8c16t ryzen 7 2700x at 4.2 ghz, which means the intel is clocked about 19.0% faster then the AMD to get a 10.4% lead in FPS. Even after tuning, Intel's top-end Core i7 lags the Ryzen chip.ΔΆ1463503 said:except that's not what we're seeing. Still, AMD's SMT-equipped Ryzen 7 2700X sets itself apart from Core i7-9700K. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, so the eight-core CPUs from Intel and AMD lead the field. The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. ![]() Core i7-9700K trails the Ryzen 5 slightly, but overclocking helps get it above Ryzen 7 2700X. This workload responds well to available resources, so AMD's Ryzen family pops back up near the top of our chart. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. Single-core performance drives responsiveness in most applications, so Intel's processors stack up in the expected hierarchy based on their frequencies. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |